Simeon Maskrey QC and Jeremy Pendlebury (instructed by Deborah Blythe of Russell-Cooke) represented the Appellant Michael Darnley on Thursday 7th June in his appeal to the Supreme Court from the dismissal of his claim against Croydon Health Services by the Court of Appeal last year.

Mr. Darnley had attended Mayday A&E department having been struck on the head in an assault, and asked to be seen urgently. He was incorrectly told by the A&E receptionist that he would have to wait for up to 4 to 5 hours. In fact, as the receptionist knew, he should have been told that (under the hospital’s head injury protocol) he would be triaged by a nurse within 30 minutes. He waited for 19 minutes and then left to go home to bed, where he collapsed due to the effects of an extra-dural haematoma caused in the assault.

The trial judge found it was foreseeable that patients who are told there would be a 4 to 5 hour wait might leave; and that it was also foreseeable that if they did so they might suffer injury. The trial judge further found that, had the Appellant been told that he would be triaged by a nurse within 30 minutes, he would have remained; and that his decision to leave was contributed to by the incorrect information.

Had the Appellant remained there was no issue that his collapse would have been at the hospital and he would have been treated sooner, avoiding permanent brain injury.

However the trial judge held there was no duty of care upon receptionists with respect to information about waiting times; and that it would not be fair just or reasonable to impose such a duty; and further that in leaving, the Appellant took responsibility for that decision.

The majority of the Court of Appeal agreed with the trial judge in these respects.

Simeon and Jeremy argued in the Supreme Court: –

  1. that, given the relationship of hospital and patient, the parties fell into a conventional category of case whereby a common law duty of care not to cause harm was owed by the hospital to the Appellant;
  2. given that the relationship fell within that conventional category, there was no requirement for the court to impose the third limb in Caparo that it had to be “fair, just and reasonable” for the duty of care to exist – following Robinson -v- Chief Constable West of Yorkshire Police;
  3. even if the third limb were to be applied, there were powerful policy grounds that it was fair, just and reasonable that such duty of care existed given the defendant’s status as an NHS healthcare provider;
  4. on conventional principles, the standard of the duty of care was that the receptionist need only take reasonable care to ensure that the information given was accurate: and in this case it was clear that that standard was broken;
  5. given that the Appellant’s decision to leave was (as found by the judge) contributed to by the incorrect information, the chain of causation was not broken.

The case has significant implications for A&E departments and patients attending A&E. The Supreme Court’s judgement is expected later this year.


Related practice areas

For help or advice please call +44 (0)20 7242 3555 or complete 
the form below

A member of the Clerking team will help you resolve your request.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, please call Chambers mainline number +44 (0)20 7242 3555 and you will be directed to the out of hours phone lines.

As a direct access client, please visit our direct access page and complete the initial form, a member of the clerking team will then be in touch to discuss the next steps.

Choosing the right barrister for your case can be difficult, with so many to choose from. Our clerks will be happy to guide you with your choice. Their wealth of knowledge and experience will help you decide the right barrister not just for the case but someone who will work with you.

Some barristers have the ability to “conduct litigation” for direct access clients. Our clerks will be able to assist you as to which of our members are trained and accredited to do so.

Please visit our direct access page for the initial steps on instructing a barrister, or contact our clerks on +44 (0)20 7242 3555.


Shortlist Builder


Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download Add to shortlist
Shortlist close
Title CV Email

Remove All


Legal Expertise

7BR is a leading set with barristers providing expertise and assistance to clients across a broad spectrum of practice areas.