Rachel Darby
Year of call
1997
Instructing Rachel Darby
For more information please contact our clerks by calling +44 (0)20 7242 3555.
Rachel Darby specialises in private client sexual offences and false allegations. She is known for her thorough preparation, strategic judgment and exemplary cross examination skills. She is a formidable advocate, with a direct approach and an exceptional understanding of human psychology in a court setting. The nature of her work means that reputation and personal integrity are particularly at stake, and she is known for her skilled client care in these dynamics.
Rachel is proactive in exposing weaknesses in the Crown’s case before trial where possible, with the aim of cases being discontinued. In this regard she adopts a tenacious approach to disclosure and other pre-trial applications, and has particular expertise in s41 (previous sexual conduct) and bad character applications where a complainant has made previous unfounded allegations.
She has been involved in a number of cases requiring the use of intermediaries for both witnesses and defendants. She is additionally instructed in appellate work, and regularly undertakes cases involving indecent images. She has extensive knowledge pertaining to SHPOs.
Rachel is qualified to accept instructions directly from clients and is registered under the Bar Council’s Public Access Scheme, meaning that members of the public who seek specialist advice can come direct to her. For more information please visit our Direct Access page here.
Legal Expertise
Sexual Offences and False Allegations
Sexual Offences and False Allegations
Rachel specialises in private client sexual offences and false allegations. She is known for her thorough preparation, strategic judgment and exemplary cross examination skills.
Notable Sexual Offences and False Allegations cases
R v D (2025)
No evidence offered in allegations of GBH and controlling and coercive behaviour made against a local councillor by his ex-partner. A 59 page defence statement was served, evidencing the falsity of the allegations. This was supported by a bad character application to admit evidence of the complainant's abusive behaviour. The case was further reviewed, resulting in no evidence being offered prior to trial.
R v E (2025)
No evidence offered prior to trial in allegation of sexual assault following service of detailed defence statement and defence evidence.
R v A (2025)
Defendant acquitted after trial of a campaign of rape and sexual assault against his 14 year old stepdaughter, and sending indecent images of her from his mobile phone.
R v S (2025)
Youth defendant acquitted after trial of multiple rapes of school friend.
R v B (2024)
Successful businessman acquitted of historic allegations of sexual assault made by four of his nieces following a three week trial. It was asserted that the complainants had colluded and had a clear financial motive for making false allegations.
R v M (2024)
No further evidence offered mid trial of defendant charged with domestic abuse against a former partner. Following robust cross-examination of the complainant, the prosecution conceded that there was no realistic prospect of success.
R v L (2024)
No evidence offered against defendant charged with multiple rapes and domestic abuse of ex-partner. The complainant had a history of making false complaints of rape, which included laying a false evidential foundation to bolster her claims before reporting to the police. Following repeated disclosure and updated bad character applications, the prosecution conceded there was no realistic prospect of success prior to any trial.
R v V (2023)
78 year old Clergyman acquitted of sexual assault against a 22 year old employee. The only issue was reasonable belief in consent. Social media evidence was admitted to assert the complainant had exaggerated the impact of the incident.
R v M (2023)
No evidence offered against doctor charged with domestic abuse against his ex-wife amidst an acrimonious separation and dispute over the defendant's contact with his children. Material was served in advance of trial undermining the litany of allegations made. A subsequent application for a restraining order was refused.
R v M (2021)
No evidence offered on appeal of youth convicted of causing or inciting a child to engage in sexual activity and robbery. The defendant had denied presence at trial. The youth court had rejected both alibi evidence from relatives, and cell site evidence showing that his mobile phone was at home at the relevant time. Inter alia, expert evidence was served demonstrating that the defendant was accessing password protected applications on his mobile phone at that time, and therefore did not leave his phone at home. The convictions were quashed without any re-trial.
R v T (2020)
Defendant acquitted after trial of multiple rapes of a child under 13 after she gave birth to his child, and sexual assault of her younger sister. He pleaded guilty to sexual activity with a child in relation to the first complainant at the start of the trial.
R v A (2020)
Club promoted acquitted at trial of sexual assault of customer while in a jacuzzi at place of work.
Crime & Regulatory
Crime & Regulatory
Rachel’s practice encompasses serious organised and grave crime including murder and other violent offences, drug trafficking, fraud, money laundering, and child cruelty. As leading, led and sole junior, she is known for her meticulous preparation, tenacious advocacy and client care. She is a skilled tactician, able to promptly cut to the essential issues.
Notable Crime & Regulatory cases
R v C
Led counsel representing a former teacher with significant mental health issues charged with the murder of his mother.
R v L
Led counsel representing double murderer, serving life imprisonment in the USA, charged with historic shooting.
R v R
Led counsel representing a defendant charged with murder in a gang related stabbing.
R v F
Attempted murder of wife with multiple kitchen knives.
R v O'B
International conspiracy to steal items made of rhinoceros horn and priceless jade artefacts from British museums, with a total value between £20 and £57 million.
R v H
Led counsel in child cruelty case involving extensive expert evidence from wide reaching medical disciplines.
R v T
Leading counsel representing manager of haulage company charged with conspiracies to import three and a half tonnes of cannabis.
R v B
Leading counsel in conspiracy to commit armed robberies,
R v A
Death by dangerous driving caused by speed.
R v N
Death by dangerous driving caused by drug use the night before.
R v F
Death by dangerous driving caused by use of mobile phone.
R v B
Leading counsel, conspiracies to commit armed robberies, involving extensive cell site and mobile phone analysis.
R v T & Ors
Leading counsel, manager of haulage company charged with conspiracies to import three and half tons of cannabis.
R v C & Ors
Leading Counsel, conspiracies to steal and launder money, involving nationwide operation and 19 investigating police forces.
R v T
Attempted murder by Oxford graduate and former Deutche Bank employee of childhood sweetheart, involving expert evidence examining obsessive personality disorder.
R v S & Ors
Junior counsel, murder involving issues of witness anonymity and multiple hearsay denied by the maker of the original statement.
R v Y
Junior counsel, murder of mother-in-law by sexual assault involving sadistic conduct.
R v S & Ors
Junior counsel, operation retriever, high profile rape and sexual abuse of young girls.
R v H
Historic child abuse of numerous family members and neighbours, and other historic sexual offences against adult family relations.
Financial Crime
Financial Crime
Alongside her complex fraud practice, she is experienced in all areas of cash seizure, restraint, confiscation and asset recovery in both the Crown and High Court.
Notable Financial Crime cases
R v A
Leading counsel in nationwide conspiracy to conceal criminal property concerning defendants accused of laundering cash for a member of the notorious north London Adams' family.
R v D
Leading counsel in £5 million gift aid fraud and money laundering.
R v C
Leading counsel in conspiracy to steal and launder money, involving nationwide operation and 19 investigating police forces.
R v S
Led counsel in £19 million bribery and corruption by housing director in local authority sector.
R v Sayed & Ors
Junior counsel, SFO prosecution of conspiracy to steal nearly £3m from CW Cheney & Sons Ltd pension fund involving convoluted scheme of appointment of nominee directors and trustees. Reported as the largest pension fraud following the Maxwell case.
R v Selby
Junior counsel, confiscation proceedings against accountant recruited to launder proceeds of the Cheney pension fraud.
R v Iqbal & Ors
Junior counsel, conspiracy to defraud concerning the UK Government’s much criticised Individual Learning Account scheme run by Capita, which collapsed following widespread abuse. Involved significant disclosure issues arising out of the role of the DfES, the legal advice they received, and the findings of a House of Commons Committee into the failures of the scheme.
R v Connors & Ors
Leading counsel, conspiracies to cheat the Inland Revenue, trade description and money laundering offences involving a 74 count indictment.
R v Royston
Confiscation involving benefit of £2.7 million reduced to £102,500.
Instructing Rachel Darby
For more information please contact our clerks by calling +44 (0)20 7242 3555.
For help or advice please call +44 (0)20 7242 3555 or complete the form below
A member of the Clerking team will help you resolve your request.
Frequently asked questions
Do you have an out of hours number?
Yes, please call Chambers mainline number +44 (0)20 7242 3555 and you will be directed to the out of hours phone lines.
How can I find out whether 7BR can take my case?
As a direct access client, please visit our direct access page and complete the initial form, a member of the clerking team will then be in touch to discuss the next steps.
Will my barrister deal with all the correspondence?
Some barristers have the ability to “conduct litigation” for direct access clients. Our clerks will be able to assist you as to which of our members are trained and accredited to do so.
How do I instruct a barrister?
Please visit our direct access page for the initial steps on instructing a barrister, or contact our clerks on +44 (0)20 7242 3555.