• CALA
  • FLBA

Instructing Anita Guha

For more information please contact our clerks by calling +44 (0)20 7242 3555.

Anita Guha is a specialist in all areas of children law and is ranked as a Leading Junior by Chambers & Partners and Legal 500.

Anita’s particular field of expertise is in the area of international family law and cases involving the cross border movement of children. Anita has recently been appointed as a Special Advocate by the Attorney General and will be undertaking cases in closed proceedings.

Anita also has undertaken cases in the Court of Protection and has a background of specialism in immigration and refugee law and has acted in a substantial number of judicial review claims in the High Court and Court of Appeal. Anita has been representing vulnerable adults and children in honour based violence and forced marriage cases for many years and has participated in a number of seminars and committees within this field to promote awareness and address recent developments.

Anita is an advocacy trainer for Middle Temple and provides voluntary legal assistance to the charity Advocate.

Anita is qualified to accept instructions directly from clients and is registered under the Bar Council’s Public Access Scheme, meaning that members of the public who seek specialist advice can come direct to her. In addition, she welcomes instructions from solicitors, in-house law departments, qualified foreign lawyers, and clients licensed by the Bar Council to give instructions direct to barristers under the Bar Council’s Licensed Access Scheme.  For more information please visit our Direct Access page here.

Legal Expertise

Family Law

Anita specialises in all areas of public and private children law. Her particular field of expertise is in the area of international family law and cases involving the cross border movement of children. Anita has recently been appointed as a Special Advocate by the Attorney General and will be undertaking cases in closed proceedings.

Anita’s areas of expertise include:

  • international cross border disputes;
  • child abduction (Hague and non Hague Convention cases);
  • Brussels II registration and enforcement cases;
  • relocation disputes;
  • wardship;
  • stranded spouses;
  • overseas surrogacy and parental order applications;
  • forced marriage and honour based violence cases;
  • Hague Convention adoption matters;
  • public law care and adoption cases;
  • residence and contact disputes;
  • judicial review claims against local authorities;
  • applications for reporting restriction orders

Anita is regularly invited to speak at conferences on specialist topics

Notable Family Law cases

Re A (a child) (relocation) [2020] All ER (Nov)

Acted for mother in successful application for international relocation and findings of fact in respect of domestic violence who had her passport seized and was prevented from leaving the jurisdiction by the court at the commencement of protracted and lengthy proceedings. Matter listed for a 5 day contested final hearing in High Court. Father was represented by Queens Counsel and sought a number of findings against the Mother in respect of cross allegations of violence and her mental health which were all dismissed by the court as untrue.

AX v CY [2020] EWHC 1599 (Fam)

Successful application in Hague Convention child abduction proceedings for summary return of child to Spain notwithstanding fact that the respondent mother relied upon a defence of settlement.

PA Media Group v A Local authority and others [2020] All ER (D) 128 (May) & A local authority v Mother and others [2020] All ER (D) 74 (May)

Represented mother in care proceedings before Hayden J in which the media successfully challenged the order made by the court anonymising the name of the local authority in its judgment.

Re S (children)(summary return) [2020] All ER (D) 73 (Apr)

Acted as junior counsel representing appellant mother in Court of Appeal in jurisdictional appeal.

ZM v NM [2020] EWHC 2413 (Fam)

Successful application for father in second set of Hague Convention proceedings for summary return of his children to Croatia

CH v GLS [2020] 4 WLR 74

Acted for respondent mother who resisted application for summary return of her child to Spain upon grounds of acquiescence and Article 13b in case where serious allegations of domestic violence were levelled against applicant

Mander & Anor v Royal Borough of Windsor & Maidenhead & Anor [2019] EWFC B64

Advised the Equality & Human Rights Commission as a specialist family lawyer in a race discrimination claim brought by a British Indian couple against an adoption agency upon the grounds that they were wrongly or unfairly rejected or discriminated against either during the process of consideration of their application for adoption and when considering whether to match them to a child. James Robottom at 7BR successfully represented the couple at trial. The case attracted widespread media interest.

AB v CD [2019] EWHC 3543 (Fam)

Successful application for summary return of child to Belgium in circumstances where the respondent mother was refusing to return with the child

Re A (children) [2019] All ER (D) 11 (Oct)

Barbara Connolly QC and Anita Guha acted for the Mother in the retrial of a fact finding hearing in stranded spouse proceedings involving 4 children before the President of the Family Division. The retrial took place after a successful appeal was pursued by Barbara Connolly QC and Anita Guha against the findings of a High Court Judge who disbelieved the mother’s case and made findings that she had not been stranded in Pakistan; the children had not been wrongfully removed by the Father to this jurisdiction from Pakistan; the Mother was the woman in a video seen to be hitting by the eldest child, and had physically abused the children on other occasions. Then Court of Appeal set aside this judgment and listed the matter for a fresh hearing before the President of the Family Division. Following a 2 week trial, the court accepted the Mother’s evidence and made all the key findings in her favour and held that the children had suffered very serious child abuse following their estrangement from their mother after she had been stranded in Pakistan for a period of 4 years.

A (Children) Re [2019] EWCA Civ 74

Acted for Appellant mother in successful appeal against findings made by a High Court Judge in a stranded spouse case involving allegations of parental alienation. Court of Appeal set aside judgment of court and remitted case to the President of the Family Division for a rehearing.

Re G (Children) (Habitual Residence) [2017] EWHC 2111

Acted for Applicant Mother who had been stranded in the UAE with her twin sons by the Father. Case listed before High Court to determine jurisdictional argument and application for summary return of children to the UK. Court granted Mother’s applications and determined in her favour that court had jurisdiction on grounds of habitual residence and/or prorogation pursuant to Article 12(3) of BIIR. Court rejected Father’s application for stay of proceedings upon grounds of forum non conveniens and made order for immediate summary return of children to this jurisdiction.

Re G (unregulated artificial conception) [2014] All ER (D) 71 (May) [L v C [2014] EWFC 1280]

Acted for Respondent and successfully opposed applications for residence and contact by former same sex partner after Respondent moved with to Ireland with child. Court accepted argument that court had no jurisdiction and dismissed applications. Court further accepted that application for declaration that applicant was a psychological parent of child should be dismissed and made limited declaration that applicant had Article 8 rights to family life at time of removal of child to Ireland.

Re F (Abduction: Consent) [2014] EWHC 484 (Fam)

Acted for Respondent in Hague Convention child abduction matter in which consent relied upon as defence.

Re S (Contact Order) [2012] EWCA Civ 128, [2011] 2 FLR 1317

Acted for mother in successful appeal in Court of Appeal against a decision by Judge to order supervised contact between father and child despite findings by court that father had perpetrated domestic violence against mother and conflict of recommendations by 2 different CAFCASS officers.

Re O (Abduction: Settlement) [2011] EWCA Civ 128

Acted for Appellant mother in Hague Convention child abduction matter in Court of Appeal. Appeal successful and court held that child should not be returned to USA upon grounds that defence of settlement was established.

M v M [2010] EWHC 3350 (Fam)

Represented mother in successful application in Hague Convention abduction matter for summary return of children to the USA.

G v B [2010] EWHC 2630 (Fam)

Represented mother in private law matter heard before the President where consideration given to the safeguarding responsibilities and duties of CAFCASS arising from the Disclosure Protocol reached between CAFCASS and the Association of Chief Police Officers.

Court of Protection

Anita has undertaken Court of Protection cases acting for local authorities and respondents predominantly in health and welfare matters and Schedule 3 of the MCA 2005. Earlier this year, Anita acted in a number of hearings in a reported case before Cobb J in a cross border case in which findings were made within the proceedings that P had been wrongfully removed to this jurisdiction from Spain by his children. TD and another v KD and another (by his litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) [2020] All ER (D) 188 (Mar)

  • ALC
  • CALA
  • FLBA

Instructing Anita Guha

For more information please contact our clerks by calling +44 (0)20 7242 3555.

For help or advice please call +44 (0)20 7242 3555 or complete 
the form below

A member of the Clerking team will help you resolve your request.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, please call Chambers mainline number +44 (0)20 7242 3555 and you will be directed to the out of hours phone lines.

As a direct access client, please visit our direct access page and complete the initial form, a member of the clerking team will then be in touch to discuss the next steps.

Choosing the right barrister for your case can be difficult, with so many to choose from. Our clerks will be happy to guide you with your choice. Their wealth of knowledge and experience will help you decide the right barrister not just for the case but someone who will work with you.

Some barristers have the ability to “conduct litigation” for direct access clients. Our clerks will be able to assist you as to which of our members are trained and accredited to do so.

Please visit our direct access page for the initial steps on instructing a barrister, or contact our clerks on +44 (0)20 7242 3555.


Shortlist Builder


Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download Add to shortlist
Shortlist close
Title CV Email

Remove All