The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) is currently conducting 10 days of hearings looking at institutional responses to child sexual abuse and exploitation facilitated by the internet.

William Chapman is representing three victims of online abuse at the Inquiry. The victims A1, A2 and A3 were all abused as young children following online grooming. A1 and A2 are brother and sister an were both abused by Anthony O’Connor who is serving a 14-year prison sentence for his offending. A3 was abused by Lawrence Glynn who was convicted of abusing her and jailed for two years.

Representatives from Facebook, Google, Apple, BT and Microsoft will all give evidence to the inquiry which will review national policies on preventing abuse facilitated by the internet and will consider the appropriateness of the response of the National Crime Agency, its CEOP Command, and the police.

The Inquiry will also investigate the policies of internet service providers, providers of online platforms, and other relevant software and communication technology companies relating to child sexual abuse, and consider the adequacy of the existing statutory and regulatory framework applicable to those organisations.

The objective of the investigation is to make practical recommendations that minimise the opportunities for abuse facilitated by the internet in the future.

Chapman told the opening day of the inquiry “the largest tech firms are failing” to prevent children at risk of sexual abuse.

“Is it really beyond the wealth and wit of these technology companies to prevent and detect child sexual abuse on their platforms?” he said.

“Or is there something incompatible with their commercial objectives… their culture and ideology… that makes them bridle at the necessary steps to curb this modern scourge?”

Legal counsel to the Inquiry told the inquiry that:

  • A UK police database contained more than 13 million indecent images of children
  • In 2018, the Internet Watch Foundation had received 105,000 reports of child sexual abuse

The inquiry continues and parts will be held behind closed doors to allow evidence to be heard in relation to matters covered by previous restrictions.

William Chapman is instructed by Switalskis Solicitors.


Related practice areas

For help or advice please call +44 (0)20 7242 3555 or complete 
the form below

A member of the Clerking team will help you resolve your request.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, please call Chambers mainline number +44 (0)20 7242 3555 and you will be directed to the out of hours phone lines.

As a direct access client, please visit our direct access page and complete the initial form, a member of the clerking team will then be in touch to discuss the next steps.

Choosing the right barrister for your case can be difficult, with so many to choose from. Our clerks will be happy to guide you with your choice. Their wealth of knowledge and experience will help you decide the right barrister not just for the case but someone who will work with you.

Some barristers have the ability to “conduct litigation” for direct access clients. Our clerks will be able to assist you as to which of our members are trained and accredited to do so.

Please visit our direct access page for the initial steps on instructing a barrister, or contact our clerks on +44 (0)20 7242 3555.


Shortlist Builder


Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download Add to shortlist
Shortlist close
Title CV Email

Remove All


Legal Expertise

7BR is a leading set with barristers providing expertise and assistance to clients across a broad spectrum of practice areas.