Following from its decision in SFO v Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation [2018] EWCA Civ 2006 that litigation privilege applied to documents concerned with the settlement or avoidance of litigation the Court of Appeal considered the extent of that application in WH Holding Limited & Anor v E 20 Stadium LLP [2018] EWCA Civ 2652. It held that the privilege did not extend to documents that were created ‘…with the dominant purpose of discussing a commercial settlement of the dispute when litigation…was in contemplation’ because such documents did not fall within the principle that to be protected the communication must be for the sole or dominant purpose of ‘obtaining information or advice’ in connection with the existing or contemplated litigation.

There are reasons for doubting the correctness or, indeed, the practicality of this decision. First, as Mr Justice Norris (whose decision was reversed on this point) said it may lead to the result that documents communicating an offer to settle would not be before the Court at trial but some of the discussions leading up to that offer would be.

Secondly, it may prove difficult to apply in practice. It may be difficult to draw the line between a communication within a company that is discussing a commercial settlement of the dispute and other communications concerning settlement. It is generally accepted that litigation privilege can be claimed by an unrepresented person.

Thirdly, it is unclear whether other forms of discussions relating to the settlement (prudential or strategic communications for example) also fall outwith the protection.

Finally, one might ask why communications discussing a commercial settlement cannot be described as communications ‘obtaining information’ in connection with actual or contemplated litigation. As the Court of Appeal itself pointed out in the ENRC case, there is a significant public interest in disputes being settled rather than litigated to judgment. That public interest surely dictates a practical and flexible approach to the extent of litigation privilege in this context.

Related practice areas

For help or advice please call +44 (0)20 7242 3555 or complete 
the form below

A member of the Clerking team will help you resolve your request.

  • This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Frequently asked questions

Yes, please call Chambers mainline number +44 (0)20 7242 3555 and you will be directed to the out of hours phone lines.

As a direct access client, please visit our direct access page and complete the initial form, a member of the clerking team will then be in touch to discuss the next steps.

Choosing the right barrister for your case can be difficult, with so many to choose from. Our clerks will be happy to guide you with your choice. Their wealth of knowledge and experience will help you decide the right barrister not just for the case but someone who will work with you.

Some barristers have the ability to “conduct litigation” for direct access clients. Our clerks will be able to assist you as to which of our members are trained and accredited to do so.

Please visit our direct access page for the initial steps on instructing a barrister, or contact our clerks on +44 (0)20 7242 3555.

Search

Shortlist Builder

Close

Select the legal expertise that you would like to download or add to the shortlist

Download Add to shortlist
Shortlist close
Title CV Email

Remove All

Download


Click here to email this list.