Skip to Main Menu | Skip to Content | Skip to Search

Seven Bedford Row
T: +44 (0) 20 7242 3555   |   E: clerks@7br.co.uk

Costs

Members of 7 Bedford Row carry out advisory work and represent a range of clients before the appellate courts as well as the Supreme Court Costs Office and District Registries. Our experience includes disputes concerning:

  • Conditional Fee Agreements, enforceability and level of success fees
  • ATE premiums
  • Level of costs recovered at detailed assessment
  • Retainer issues
  • Costs capping
  • Wasted costs
  • Costs issues specific to group litigation
  • Third party applications for costs
  • Costs in pre-action disclosure applications
  • The effect on costs orders of Part 36 offers and payments
  • Applications for interim costs orders
  • Applications pursuant to CPR 44.3 that the successful party be deprived of all or part of its costs or that it pay costs referable to issues on which it was unsuccessful
  • Applications relating to procedure and practice including the correct construction of CPR 47.8
  • The effect of costs estimates on costs recovery

Recent cases include:

  • The Bloody Sunday Inquiry
  • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department & The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis exp Haw: the application of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 to a continuing demonstration in Parliament Square
  • The Bichard Inquiry: the public inquiry into child protection procedures applied by police forces in the aftermath of the Soham murders
  • The De Menezes inquest: the inquest into the shooting of Jean Charles De Menezes at Stockwell underground station in 2005
  • Secretary of State for Education & Skills v Mairs: challenging the decision to place a social worker concerned with the care of Victoria Climbie on a list of those unsuitable to work with children
  • British Horseracing Authority v Tierney: the decision by horse racing's disciplinary body to ban a trainer in a case in which a horse had been used as a ringer.