
Members of Chambers are highly experienced in family cases which consider the use and ambit of s97 (2) Children Act 1989, s12 Administration of Justice Act 1960, and the “parallel anaylsis” of competing Convention Rights. They are familiar with the drafting of Reporting Restriction Orders and Injunctions which may be necessary to preserve the confidentiality of some or all of those involved in Children Act cases -be they children, parents or professionals. They are able to advise upon issues surrounding the use of anticipatory injunctions against the media in certain cases, the process and procedure to be adopted, and the desirability or otherwise of the same within the context of a need for accountability of the family courts to the public.
G v B [2010] EWHC 2630 (Fam); Fam Div (Sir Nicholas Wall (President Fam)) 25/10/2010.
The President of the Family Division reminded judges conducting hearings pursuant to the Revised Private Law Programme [2010] 2 FLR 496 that consideration should be given to the safeguarding responsibilities and duties of CAFCASS arising from the Disclosure Protocol reached between CAFCASS and the Association of Chief Police Officers.
M v M [2010] EWHC 3350 (Fam)
Hague Convention child abduction proceedings in which the Court rejected defences of consent, acquiescence and Article 13(b) by a parent who was relying upon intolerability and hardship arising from criminal proceedings and his decision to give up employment and accommodation and abduct the children to England.
CW v (1) NT (2) TT (A CHILD BY HER GUARDIAN JF) [2011] EWHC 33 (Fam)
Very considerable risks of entering surrogacy agreement. Surrogate mother who changed her mind and refused to give child to father and his wife after birth is found to be better able to meet child’s needs.
A v Ward [2010] EWHC 16 (Fam) ; Re W [2010] EWHC 205 (Fam); [2010] 1 FLR 1497
Lord Justice Munby (sitting as a Judge of the Family Division) ruled that s12 of the Administration of Justice Act can be disapplied and rejected applications of anonymity of the professionals involved to be preserved.
G v N County Council [2009] 1FLR 774
The court granted a declaration that the removal by a local authority of a child (subject to a care order) from its mother was unlawful, but refused an interim injunction requiring the child to be returned to the mother’s care upon the basis that on balance the evidence supported removal.
W (Children) [2009] EWCA Civ 59
The Court of Appeal considered the status of adoption orders where miscarriage of justice is alleged. Adoption orders made in good faith on the evidence available at the time must stand.
Re P (A Child) Sub-nom SB v E County Council [2008] EWCA Civ 535: The Times, May 29, 2008
The Court of Appeal gave guidance in respect of the Adoption and Children Act 2002; the making of placement orders; post-adoption contact and the concept of “dual planning”.
BBC and CAFCASS Legal & Others [2007] 2 FLR 765
An application by BBC and Mother for disclosure of judgment in care proceedings into public domain, together with release of video diaries, for the purpose of broadcasting a documentary about the case. Issues relating to safeguarding the anonymity of social workers, other professionals and experts.
Norfolk County Council and Webster & Others [2007] 1 FLR 1146
On an application by the BBC and Associated Newspapers Limited & Others, Mr Justice Munby permitted the media to attend and report upon care proceedings relating to Brandon Webster. A reporting restriction order was made, to protect the identity of various witnesses/professionals. See also:
Norfolk County Council v Webster [2007] 2 FLR 415
B and B v A County Council [2007] 1 FLR 1189
Re X (Emergency Protection Orders) [2006] 2 FLR 701
Guidance given re. Emergency Protection Orders; and the role of the applicant local authority in applying for the same.
Re K Care: (Threshold Criteria) [2006] 2 FLR 868
Life threatening injuries caused to a child will be likely to establish the threshold criteria in respect of that child’s sibling.
10 March 2011, 5.30pm
Using a working case study, a combination of criminal, extradition and family lawyers aim to highlight many of the legal and practical issues involved in dealing with central authorities and requesting states.
For a copy of the flyer for the seminar please click here.
7 February 2011, 6.00pm
Panel discussion to be chaired by Baroness Hale of Richmond.
For a copy of the flyer for the seminar please click here.
28 September 2010, 6.00pm
A seminar for experienced family lawyers, to consider contemporary legal issues and to provide a forum for discussion.
For a copy of the flyer for the seminar please click here.
19 April 2010, 6.00pm
By invitation of the Child and Family Law Team at 7 Bedford Row, The Centre for Family Law and Practice held a seminar on Forced Marriage.
Rachel Langdale QC and Anita Guha, barristers at 7 Bedford Row spoke alongside Olaf Henricson-Bell of the Forced Marriage Unit and Anne-Marie Hutchinson OBE, partner of Dawson Cornwell Solicitors.
(5).jpg)
Phone: +44 (0) 20 7400 7309
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7242 2511
Email: dfarlam@7br.co.uk
(12).jpg)
Phone: +44 (0) 20 7400 7305
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7242 2511
Email: peeles@7br.co.uk